The UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard Guide: Part 11: Carbon offsetting
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae85a/ae85acfa81b282a3f8f58def60df92f2b82998cb" alt="uknzcbs logo"
BEng
Senior Engineer
Partner
The pilot version of the UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard (the Standard) was published in September 2024. The full document can be downloaded here. The Standard has been produced by a range of industry professional organisations including RIBA (architecture), IStructE (structural engineering), CIBSE (services engineers) and RICS (surveyors), along with a large team of other industry organisations and professionals.
It aims to set out unambiguously, for a wide range of scenarios, the characteristics that buildings and building projects need to be aligned with the UK’s strategy to become net zero carbon by 2050. The Standard builds upon and supersedes previously published approaches such as the UKGBC Net Zero Carbon Building Framework, the RIBA Climate Challenge and the various LETI design guides.
Read more from our guide:
The standard is written from the position that fossil fuels should not be used within buildings by default. If a project burns fossil fuels for space heating or producing hot water, it cannot be verified as being “Net Zero Carbon aligned”. However, the standard does not prohibit the use of fossil fuels in certain scenarios.
There are certain energy uses which are excluded from the scope of the building operational energy assessment, and are therefore not covered by the requirement to be fossil fuel free. They are:
It is unlikely (though not impossible) that a building would serve these energy uses from fossil fuel sources.
In addition to the items which are outside of scope, the standard allows the use of fossil fuels in the below circumstances:
Max Fordham has a long history of designing projects which minimise and avoid the use of fossil fuels for the production of space heating and hot water. Some of our more recent projects include:
Six domestic scale ASHPs concealed in camouflaged acoustic enclosures at Sherborne Abbey
We are currently working on projects within the practice with the aim of avoiding the need for life safety generators by replacing them with battery back up systems instead. This presents significant challenges on a number of fronts: spatial (more internal space needed for batteries), environmental (batteries need to be kept cool), and in relation to standards, which currently lag behind battery technology and point towards diesel generators as being the only viable option.
When viewed from a Whole Life Carbon perspective, it is not yet clear whether batteries, which have their own associated embodied environmental impacts or generators provide the lowest carbon solution, for systems that are only used infrequently, such as during testing.
Comments on the proposals
Aspects we think work well
Aspects recommended be considered for further development